Case translation: Estonia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14296/deeslr.v16i0.5081Abstract
TlnRnKo 09.01.2017, 1-15-9051, Tallinna Ringkonnakohus (Tallinn Circuit Court), 9 January 2017
Estonia; VAT on property; admissibility of evidence collected by surveillance; digital evidence guidelines; continuity of evidence (also known as chain of custody); MD5 hash – whether sufficient to prove evidence not altered; status of opinion of external expert (a lawyer)