Does the Doctor Know Best? A Deconstruction of Informed Consent
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14296/islr.v4i2.2425Abstract
The law in relation to informed consent has shifted to a patient-centred approach and no longer is the doctor deemed to know best. It is only when the patient has been given sufficient knowledge of the treatment, do they have the power to make an informed choice.
This article analyses the law of informed consent and outlines how the law has finally recognised the right of patient autonomy. It is now the patient, not the doctor, who has the right to decide. Particular focus will be placed on information disclosure, what this entails, and how it enables greater protection and empowerment for the patient. Finally, as the law in regards to informed consent is still fluid, comparative law from other jurisdictions and guidance from the medical profession will be analysed to gauge the best course for development.
This article offers a unique objective view of the law in relation to informed consent by not only outlining its accolades but also highlighting where ambiguity remains. It will conclude that the right of patient autonomy in informed consent is unassailable and the law will only further develop along this line of patient-centred thinking.
Downloads
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Work published in the IALS Student Law Review is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Those who contribute items to IALS Student Law Review retain author copyright in their work but are asked to grant two licences. One is a licence to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study of the University of London, enabling us to reproduce the item in digital form, so that it can be made available for access online in the open journal system and repository and website. The terms of the licence which you are asked to grant to the University for this purpose are as follows:
'I grant to the University of London the irrevocable, non-exclusive royalty-free right to reproduce, distribute, display, and perform this work in any format including electronic formats throughout the world for educational, research, and scientific non-profit uses during the full term of copyright including renewals and extensions'
The other licence is for the benefit of those who wish to make use of items published online in IALS Student Law Review and stored in the e-repository. For this purpose we use a Creative Commons licence allowing others to download your works and share them with others as long as they mention you and link back to your entry in IALS Student Law Review and/or SAS-SPACE, but they can't change them in any way or use them commercially.
