The United Kingdom’s welfare state in practice: A case study of Personal Independence Payment (PIP)
This paper is based on a volunteering experience at Merseyside Welfare Rights (MWR) from June 2015. It was possible to observe a range of procedures with regards to the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) ranging from form filling, attendance of face-to-face assessments to observation of various tribunals. The hands on involvement indicated various difficulties faced by both advisors and claimants in obtaining access to PIP. As such, this research paper analyses if these challenges could be as a result of differences that exist in theory and in practice in relation to the application process and accessing information for PIP, from the claimant’s point of view. Upon receiving ethics approval, primary research was obtained from four PIP claimants who were represented at their tribunal by MWR. Subsequently, empirical data were collated and these have indicated that there are indeed five key differences in theory and in practice with regards to the PIP. Namely that the PIP process is not as effective as it claims to be and that the application is not fit for its purpose. This paper also exemplifies how charities such as MWR have been used by claimants to bridge the gap that exists in theory and practice. With budget cuts reducing the funding of these bridges, it is clear that the coalition government needs to reform the PIP to ensure fairness and justice for its claimants.
Work published in the IALS Student Law Review is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Those who contribute items to IALS Student Law Review retain author copyright in their work but are asked to grant two licences. One is a licence to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study of the University of London, enabling us to reproduce the item in digital form, so that it can be made available for access online in the open journal system and repository and website. The terms of the licence which you are asked to grant to the University for this purpose are as follows:
'I grant to the University of London the irrevocable, non-exclusive royalty-free right to reproduce, distribute, display, and perform this work in any format including electronic formats throughout the world for educational, research, and scientific non-profit uses during the full term of copyright including renewals and extensions'
The other licence is for the benefit of those who wish to make use of items published online in IALS Student Law Review and stored in the e-repository. For this purpose we use a Creative Commons licence allowing others to download your works and share them with others as long as they mention you and link back to your entry in IALS Student Law Review and/or SAS-SPACE, but they can't change them in any way or use them commercially