Challenging an arbitration award: some key principles

Authors

  • Khawar Qureshi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v2003i50.1054

Abstract

The author examines the restrictive approach adopted by the High Court since the introduction of the Arbitration Act 1996, in reviewing the arbitral process, as confirmed in the very limited number of cases which have been presented by parties thus far. Published in Amicus Curiae - Journal of the Society for Advanced Legal Studies. The Journal is produced by the Society for Advanced Legal Studies at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2003-01-01

Issue

Issue 50 (2003)

Section

Articles

License

Those who contribute items to Amicus Curiae retain author copyright in their work but are asked to grant two licences. One is a licence to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, enabling us to reproduce the item in digital form, so that it can be made available for access online in the open journal system, repository, and website. The terms of the licence which you are asked to grant to the University for this purpose are as follows:

'I grant to the University of London the irrevocable, non-exclusive royalty-free right to reproduce, distribute, display, and perform this work in any format including electronic formats throughout the world for educational, research, and scientific non-profit uses during the full term of copyright including renewals and extensions'.

The other licence is for the benefit of those who wish to make use of items published online in Amicus Curiae and stored in the e-repository. For this purpose we use a Creative Commons licence (http://www.creativecommons.org.uk/); which allows others to download your works and share them with others as long as they mention you and link back to your entry in Amicus Curiae and/or SAS-SPACE; but they can't change them in any way or use them commercially.