The law of restitution: taking stock

Authors

  • The Right Hon The Lord Millett

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v1999i14.1503

Keywords:

Restitution, United Kingdom

Abstract

Despite the decision of the House of Lords in the Guinness Mahon case, which provided answers to some unanswered questions in the difficult area of restitution, many other questions still remain. In this article the Right Honourable the Lord Millett describes the current state of play, detailing in particular some of the remaining areas of possible controversy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Issue

Issue 14 (1999)

Section

Articles

License

Those who contribute items to Amicus Curiae retain author copyright in their work but are asked to grant two licences. One is a licence to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, enabling us to reproduce the item in digital form, so that it can be made available for access online in the open journal system, repository, and website. The terms of the licence which you are asked to grant to the University for this purpose are as follows:

'I grant to the University of London the irrevocable, non-exclusive royalty-free right to reproduce, distribute, display, and perform this work in any format including electronic formats throughout the world for educational, research, and scientific non-profit uses during the full term of copyright including renewals and extensions'.

The other licence is for the benefit of those who wish to make use of items published online in Amicus Curiae and stored in the e-repository. For this purpose we use a Creative Commons licence (http://www.creativecommons.org.uk/); which allows others to download your works and share them with others as long as they mention you and link back to your entry in Amicus Curiae and/or SAS-SPACE; but they can't change them in any way or use them commercially.