Reducing overreliance on credit ratings: failing strategies and the need to start from scratch
Keywords:Financial services, banking law, credit ratings, Rating agencies
In 2010 the Financial Stability Board (FSB) issued a set of principles to deal with such a problem. The proposed strategy is based on two levels of action: (i) encouraging market participants to perform their own due diligence and internal risk management; and (ii) revisiting in the regulatory framework those references to ratings which may negatively influence investors due to their potentiality to be regarded as a public endorsement of creditworthiness. So far, the translation of the two pronged approach has made very little progress at national, regional and international levels.
In this short article, Francesco De Pascalis (research degree student at IALS) illustrates the reasons why the proposed approach is failing to achieve its objectives. In doing so, it will discuss overreliance on credit ratings and the strategy advanced to address this problem, including its drawbacks and how it is perceived by CRAs and users of ratings. Significantly, the approach is considered as ill-advised and as an overreaction by the users of ratings. Consequently, this article suggests that the debate on excessive reliance should re-start on new bases.
Those who contribute items to Amicus Curiae retain author copyright in their work but are asked to grant two licences. One is a licence to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, enabling us to reproduce the item in digital form, so that it can be made available for access online in the open journal system, repository, and website. The terms of the licence which you are asked to grant to the University for this purpose are as follows:
'I grant to the University of London the irrevocable, non-exclusive royalty-free right to reproduce, distribute, display, and perform this work in any format including electronic formats throughout the world for educational, research, and scientific non-profit uses during the full term of copyright including renewals and extensions'.
The other licence is for the benefit of those who wish to make use of items published online in Amicus Curiae and stored in the e-repository. For this purpose we use a Creative Commons licence (http://www.creativecommons.org.uk/); which allows others to download your works and share them with others as long as they mention you and link back to your entry in Amicus Curiae and/or SAS-SPACE; but they can't change them in any way or use them commercially.