Innovation and continuity in law-making
AbstractArticle by Richard Heaton CB (First Parliamentary Counsel and Permanent Secretary at the Cabinet Office) developed from the 2014 Sir William Dale Memorial Lecture delivered by the author at the Institute of Advanced
Legal Studies on May 14, 2014. Inspired by Sir William Dale's wide-ranging and stimulating writing and his belief that our laws should be effective, clear, necessary, coherent and accessible, Richard Heaton explores what the Dale challenge meant in the 1970s; what it would have meant to earlier generations; and what it means to us today. He suggests that Dale’s work inspires us to look at the history of law-making and the ways in which Law is associated with continuity - with a purpose, a role in society (mediating
between the people and the institutions of the State) that are remarkably constant.
Those who contribute items to Amicus Curiae retain author copyright in their work but are asked to grant two licences. One is a licence to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, enabling us to reproduce the item in digital form, so that it can be made available for access online in the open journal system, repository, and website. The terms of the licence which you are asked to grant to the University for this purpose are as follows:
'I grant to the University of London the irrevocable, non-exclusive royalty-free right to reproduce, distribute, display, and perform this work in any format including electronic formats throughout the world for educational, research, and scientific non-profit uses during the full term of copyright including renewals and extensions'.
The other licence is for the benefit of those who wish to make use of items published online in Amicus Curiae and stored in the e-repository. For this purpose we use a Creative Commons licence (http://www.creativecommons.org.uk/); which allows others to download your works and share them with others as long as they mention you and link back to your entry in Amicus Curiae and/or SAS-SPACE; but they can't change them in any way or use them commercially.