The European Parliament’s AI Regulation

Should We Call It Progress?

Authors

  • Meeri Haataja
  • Joanna J. Bryson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v4i3.5612

Abstract

The European Union (EU) has been leading the world with its influential digital regulation. However, the EU’s legislative process is sufficiently complex and careful that some national legislation clearly influenced by the EU’s AI Regulation is already in place in other countries, before the law has even been finalized in the EU. Meanwhile, other states and regions are just beginning to develop AI policy. For both the EU and such others, we here describe the outcomes of the first round of legislative action by one of the EU’s two legislative bodies, the European Parliament, in terms of modifying the Artificial Intelligence Act. The Parliament has introduced a number of changes we consider to be enormously important, some in a very good way, and some in a very bad way. At stake is whether the AI Act really brings the power and strength of product law to continuously scale improved practice on products in the EU with intelligent components, or whether the law becomes window-dressing aimed only at attacking a few elite actors post hoc. We describe here the EU process, the changes and our recommendations.

Keywords: AI Act; digital governance; AI regulation; parliamentary processes; European Union; transnational regulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-12

Issue

Section

Special Section: AI and its Regulation (Part 1)