Can Historical Jurisprudence Inform the Artificial Intelligence and Law Debate?

Authors

  • Geoffrey Samuel

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v6i1.5729

Abstract

The publication of a monograph by Dr Luca Siliquini-Cinelli on the history of scientia iuris in which he argues that law is a constructed form of knowledge that differs from experience is not just an important and very learned contribution to historical jurisprudence. The book’s thesis is also making an important contribution to the debate about the impact, and probable future impact, of artificial intelligence (AI) on law, legal thought and legal reasoning. In critically reviewing the book, this essay will briefly indicate how and why Dr Siliquini-Cinelli’s book is establishing a fundamental relationship between historical jurisprudence (understood as the history of legal thought) and AI.

Keywords: artificial intelligence (AI); epistemology; legal singularity; map; model; philosophy; rule-theorist; territory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-04

Issue

Section

Special Section: Scientia Iuris by Luca Siliquini-Cinelli