Naming, Blaming but Not Claiming
Intersectionality, Power and Sexual Harassment in the Workplace Post #MeToo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v7i1.5826Abstract
In the context of #MeToo, addressing workplace sexual harassment is a critical issue. This article discusses aspects of the author’s empirical work on the role of intersectional identities in influencing Black women’s perceptions of their workplace sexual harassment and pursuit of access to justice in England and Wales and elaborates further on its findings in light of recent legal developments. It draws on Felstiner, Abel and Sarat’s “Naming, Blaming, Claiming” framework (1980-1981) to examine the extent to which Black women in England and Wales seek redress for their harms. It argues that aspects of Black women’s intersecting identities, including their race, gender, and physical characteristics interact with workplace power dynamics to negatively inform their decisions to blame and claim and shape their assumptions about being stereotyped by their employers and lawyers/the legal system. It concludes that, while the Black women tend to name and blame, there was a hesitancy to claim.
Keywords: intersectionality; naming; blaming; claiming; power; access to justice; #MeToo.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Those who contribute items to Amicus Curiae retain author copyright in their work but are asked to grant two licences. One is a licence to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, enabling us to reproduce the item in digital form, so that it can be made available for access online in the open journal system, repository, and website. The terms of the licence which you are asked to grant to the University for this purpose are as follows:
'I grant to the University of London the irrevocable, non-exclusive royalty-free right to reproduce, distribute, display, and perform this work in any format including electronic formats throughout the world for educational, research, and scientific non-profit uses during the full term of copyright including renewals and extensions'.
The other licence is for the benefit of those who wish to make use of items published online in Amicus Curiae and stored in the e-repository. For this purpose we use a Creative Commons licence (http://www.creativecommons.org.uk/); which allows others to download your works and share them with others as long as they mention you and link back to your entry in Amicus Curiae and/or SAS-SPACE; but they can't change them in any way or use them commercially.
