Addressing the Legal Challenges of Unregulated Surrogacy in Ghana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v7i2.5880Abstract
This article examines the legal and ethical issues posed by unregulated surrogacy in Ghana. Surrogacy is an arrangement where a woman (the surrogate) carries and delivers a child for an intended parent or parents. The egg and sperm used may originate from the intended parent(s), or may be obtained by donation or purchase. The article highlights the potential legal and ethical complications arising from the absence of comprehensive legislation governing such arrangements. The core problem is the lack of legal frameworks to address parentage, rights, and responsibilities in scenarios involving donated gametes and surrogate motherhood. This deficiency leaves children, intended parents, and surrogates vulnerable to disputes, exploitation, and legal ambiguity.
The article explores the complexities of surrogacy, including instances where intended parents utilize donated eggs or sperm, or where same-sex couples seek parenthood. It emphasizes the risk of parental repudiation due to a lack of biological connection, a scenario with severe consequences for the child’s wellbeing. By comparing surrogacy regulations in other jurisdictions, the study underscores the urgent need for Ghana to enact specific laws. Key findings reveal that Ghana’s current legal framework only addresses birth certificate modifications through High Court orders, leaving broader surrogacy issues unaddressed. The article concludes that the absence of dedicated legislation creates a legal vacuum, necessitating the immediate development and implementation of comprehensive surrogacy laws to protect all parties involved.
Keywords: surrogacy regulation; assisted reproductive technology; Ghana; reproductive tourism; the Casablanca Declaration; commodification of children; Ghanaian law.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Those who contribute items to Amicus Curiae retain author copyright in their work but are asked to grant two licences. One is a licence to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, enabling us to reproduce the item in digital form, so that it can be made available for access online in the open journal system, repository, and website. The terms of the licence which you are asked to grant to the University for this purpose are as follows:
'I grant to the University of London the irrevocable, non-exclusive royalty-free right to reproduce, distribute, display, and perform this work in any format including electronic formats throughout the world for educational, research, and scientific non-profit uses during the full term of copyright including renewals and extensions'.
The other licence is for the benefit of those who wish to make use of items published online in Amicus Curiae and stored in the e-repository. For this purpose we use a Creative Commons licence (http://www.creativecommons.org.uk/); which allows others to download your works and share them with others as long as they mention you and link back to your entry in Amicus Curiae and/or SAS-SPACE; but they can't change them in any way or use them commercially.
