Sexual Harassment, Power and Barriers to Access to Justice
An Intersectional Analysis
Abstract
In the context of workplace sexual harassment, recognizing and addressing the inequalities that Black women face in seeking access to justice remains a pertinent issue. This article discusses aspects of the author’s empirical work on the role of Black women’s intersectional identities in influencing their tendency to seek redress for these harms in England and Wales. It draws on intersectionality theory and Rebecca Sandefur’s framing of inequalities which shape how individuals engage with legal and legal-like institutions. The article refines Sandefur’s understanding of inequalities by demonstrating how different aspects of identity interact with power to influence an individual’s decision about pursuing formal avenues of redress. It argues that the participants’ decisions on whether to seek legal recourse are shaped by their assumptions about judges and lawyers not recognizing their experiences or giving due credibility to their grievances. The participants’ perceptions also influence their willingness to use legal resources to access justice.
Keywords: access to justice; intersectionality; sexual harassment; power.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Those who contribute items to Amicus Curiae retain author copyright in their work but are asked to grant two licences. One is a licence to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, enabling us to reproduce the item in digital form, so that it can be made available for access online in the open journal system, repository, and website. The terms of the licence which you are asked to grant to the University for this purpose are as follows:
'I grant to the University of London the irrevocable, non-exclusive royalty-free right to reproduce, distribute, display, and perform this work in any format including electronic formats throughout the world for educational, research, and scientific non-profit uses during the full term of copyright including renewals and extensions'.
The other licence is for the benefit of those who wish to make use of items published online in Amicus Curiae and stored in the e-repository. For this purpose we use a Creative Commons licence (http://www.creativecommons.org.uk/); which allows others to download your works and share them with others as long as they mention you and link back to your entry in Amicus Curiae and/or SAS-SPACE; but they can't change them in any way or use them commercially.
